Pymmes
pissed off, Specials shrug their shoulders
Smiler Herlihy
the Sundowns' designated team "tosser" lost and
we were to spend the first session in the field against our
old rivals Pymmes.
Hendricks
and Chambers (a previous centurion against us) opened up the
innings for Pymmes. Once again Dom Pilgrim, being our one
bowler of any pace, opened our attack from his favoured end.
Following
the naming of the uphill end
as the "Richard Bathard end"
last week, Dom has just about earned the right to have the
downhill end named after him.
I will consult
the team and let you know next week if a naming ceremony has
been conducted!
Scoring started
slowly for the visitors, with Pilgrim, and the returning Cattell
(back injury seemingly recovered), bowling tightly on a slow
wicket that was still damp from the rain during the week.
With the score
on 12 Cattell created the first real chance. He got the ball
to bounce, off the Southover infamous ridge, and Chambers
dabbed a cut to yours truly in the gully.
This should,
without doubt, have been snaffled [you're dead right, it
was a dolly - Ed] and you can imagine my pained look when
the ball cannoned off my hand into the ground.
I looked up
and was even more aggrieved when it dawned on me the batsman
was Chambers. I had visions of the man completing another
ton against us.
To the rescue
- Dom Pilgrim in the next over. Chambers shuffled across his
stumps and was struck on the pad, resulting not only in Pilgrim's
cry for LBW, but a cry from the usually "I was concentrating
on wicket keeping too much to appeal" McGowan.
The umpire
raised his digit, giving great relief to all on the fielding
side - especially my good self.
Shortly afterwards
Pilgrim clean bowled Hendricks, with one of those peachy deliveries
us Sundowners wish he could concoct more often.
Cattell continued
to bowl a tight line, and with the score stagnating for Pymmes,
skipper McGowan decided to open up the game. Cattell had conceded
only nine runs from his six overs.
Mark Naisbitt,
having given himself plenty of time to loosen his ever-tiring
body, was brought on at the "Bathard end" and immediately
dropped on to a nagging length.
His long and
varied warm up procedure soon produced a result, when Reed
was required to do nothing other than protect his privates
to take a sharp catch from a well-worked field placing (silly
mid-off) by the skip.
Following
Pilgrim's two dismissals, and Naisbitt's early contribution,
Pymmes sent in two new batsmen both unknown to the home team.
Chas and Vijay started to construct a partnership.
Ringo
Tailor was called in to the attack by skipper Mick McGowan,
by now following an established formula in his captaincy.
Ringo bowled
his eclectic mix of the unplayable, and eminently wackable,
delivery but failed to make any inroads.
When his 50-plus-year-old
frame eventually gave up after three overs he had conceded
14 runs.
With Vijay
and Chas looking dangerous, Tailor was replaced by the Sundowns'
"bowling find of the year", Dave Reed. Dave's figures
so far this year read: five overs, no maidens, 62 runs, one
wicket.
It remains
to be seen whether Dave will persevere with this new-found
occupation, or revert back to batting and wicket keeping where
he has been far more successful over many years with the club.
Anyway, Mr
Reed bowled two overs reasonably successfully, without looking
like penetrating the partnership.
It was his
third over that jumps off the score book at you.
In terms of
expensiveness, the over was not too bad. It was the sheer
number of deliveries that astounds.
Having started
with a wide, he conceded a single. So far one legitimate delivery.
The third
was a dot ball, the fourth another wide, the fifth a dot,
the sixth another wide, the seventh another dot (do you see
a pattern developing?). We have now completed four legal deliveries.
The next delivery dribbled (this is the most apt word to describe
the delivery), towards the batsman before coming to a halt
well short of the wicket - a no ball.
Luckily for
Dave the batsman declined a free hit as last time he did this
he put his shoulder out - ah! The vagaries of Sunday cricket.
The over kind-of
meandered along after this with a couple more wides, until
it was eventually completed with the eleventh delivery.
Only seven
runs from 11 deliveries, Dave looked relatively pleased with
his afternoon's work!
Chas and Vijay
were both batting well, and looking confident. McGowan again
rang the changes, this time introducing Paulo Manzi for his
first-ever bowl for the Specials.
Manzi's mix
of deliveries was not quite as varied as Reed's but his medium
pace needs a little refining if he is to make strides in the
bowling department.
Youth is,
however, on his side, unlike the aforementioned Reed. Manzi
managed three overs for 26 without worrying the wickets or
maidens column.
Meanwhile
at the "Bathard end" your correspondent had been
thrown the ball, no doubt in the hope he could repeat his
feats of the previous weeks - a tall order.
I failed,
of course, to claim another five-for, but I did find myself
on a hat-trick having removed Vijay for a fine 53 and Chalkley
first ball. Dom Pilgrim took a good catch to dismiss Vijay
and the unfortunate Chalkley was clean bowled. No hat-trick
this week.
Pymmes continued
to make progress, despite Dom producing another unplayable
delivery to bowl Chas (55). Pymmes
eventually
declared on 174 for six at tea off 43 overs. Uday finishing
22 no.
After another
fine contribution from Pat - the tea being full of many and
varied delights - the rather-full Andy Vernon and Smiler Herlihy
opened up for Sundowns.
The out-of-form
Herlihy decided on the gritty approach, and was first out
on 23 (his best effort so far this season), caught and bowled
Chambers. The opening partnership of 57 was just what the
Specials needed as a base.
Vernon was
joined by Steve Golding, and was unlucky to play on from Chambers
shortly afterwards. His innings of 31 had been a fine one
and included one particularly memorable flick off his legs
over mid-on for four.
Specials stood
at 58 for two. Golding and Medlock (your correspondent) started
to run some quick singles and keep the scoreboard ticking
over. This policy, along with one or two lusty blows for four
and six by both batsmen, kept Specials on target.
With the score
moving along nicely, Chambers produced a high full toss to
my good self. The ball disappeared into the greenery behind
his arm and I took a swing at where I thought the ball was.
The next sound
was not that of willow on leather, but of the stumps collapsing
behind me. As I went to trudge, non-too merrily, on my way,
I looked up to see the umpire (our very own Dave Cattell)
signalling no ball for a high delivery. What a let off!
Cue some very,
very blue language from the Pymmes boys!
As we encroached
the final 20, the target remained about seven an over. Pymmes
heads were starting to drop and the target was coming down
slowly. The light wasn't great but we kept the score ticking
over and never let the target get too far away.
Uday, who
opened the bowling, had come back on after a short break.
This coincided with Gareth Williams (sidelined yet again,
but still managing a mention in the report), taking up the
umpiring mantle from the far end.
Uday's several
vociferous appeals, for LBW, failed to impress our version
of David Shepherd, and added to the already tense atmosphere
in the middle.
Pymmes rang
the changes, Chalkley, who had bowled unchanged, came off,
before returning again soon after - the alternatives having
no success.
With only
14 required from the final four overs my luck ran out as I
struck a full toss straight to a Pymmes fielder who took a
good clean catch. I departed having just completed my 50.
Golding and
"I don't get out" McGowan were left to complete
the job, which Golds did with a
swept four to win the game and complete a very good 50 no.
The skip was four no.
Once again,
Reed and Mark (you will have to hone your batting skills with
Lionel
Length) Naisbitt were left sitting on the bench all padded
up with nowhere to go.
I'm sure,
knowing the Specials, their batting will be being reported
on sooner rather than later.
The atmosphere
was a bit frosty as the teams left the pitch. Pymmes felt
the rub of the green had been rather cruel to them and were
in no mood to congratulate their winning opponents.
Win number
three out of three for Sundowns.
We look forward
to the return game later on in the year when I'm sure there
will be some fine cricket and maybe some controversy to report.
On to the
days winners and losers:
The
Winners:
I know it's boring, but "thanks Ump!" me again.
A couple of wickets and 51 runs.
Steve "one
over of slog and miss" Golding, a maiden 50 for the season.
Andy "more
smoked salmon sandwiches please" Vernon, 30 runs (becoming
his standard contribution).
Smiler "slowly
coming back to form" Herlihy, 23 runs.
The skipper
(Mike McGowan), still not out and still winning.
Dom "will
he get the downhill end named after him?" Pilgrim, three
wickets for 41 from 13 overs.
Mark "is
that the score
oh great I won't have to bat" Naisbitt,
economical spell with the ball: one for 34.
The Losers:
Dave "bowled too well to get a wicket" Cattell,
sorry about the catch Dave
Dave "surely
he will get a bat soon" Reed, the longest over of the
season so far!
Pymmes - well
where do we start
?
Ann
Whitbread - Ann let us know if the skipper is still sticking
to his no-sex vigil so we can remove you from the column (ooh
er missus!).
Next week
we take a fixture from the Cricket Conference, so, as yet,
our oppo is unknown, but tune in cricket lovers, to catch
up with the latest Specials escapades.
© Tony
Medlock 2002
|